What type of data should be collected during GEMD audits?

The choice indicating that quantitative and qualitative data related to compliance metrics should be collected during GEMD audits is correct because it reflects the comprehensive approach necessary for effective auditing. Quantitative data provides measurable and objective evidence, which can be statistically analyzed to evaluate compliance against established benchmarks. This might include numerical data related to operational efficiency, error rates, or incidence of non-compliance.

On the other hand, collecting qualitative data is equally important as it offers context and insights that numbers alone cannot provide. This type of data could include personal observations, employee feedback, and perceptions of compliance processes, allowing auditors to understand the nuances behind the statistical figures.

By integrating both quantitative and qualitative data, auditors can create a well-rounded picture of the compliance landscape, identify areas for improvement, and help formulate strategies to enhance overall performance. This dual approach fosters a more thorough understanding of the issues at hand and how they might impact compliance and operational effectiveness.